Saturday, June 04, 2005

Cakewalking to the Apocalypse

Well now. Clifford May is concerned, very concerned, about how things are going in Iraq. He's beginning to wonder: what would be the consequence of an American defeat in Iraq? Well it seems that the consequence would be the geopolitical equivalent of Bosch's "Judgement Day."
It surely would mean a blood bath as the Ba'athist insurgents and al-Qaeda terrorists settled scores and demonstrated – as an object lesson for others -- the price that must be paid for collaborating with American infidels.

Iraqi terrorist training camps would no doubt be re-opened. Refurbishing Salman Pak, for example, not only would humiliate America but, more practically, could turn out skilled replacements for those combatants lost during the Iraq and Afghanistan campaigns. . . .

Al-Qaeda, Saddam loyalists, agents of the Iranian mullahs – whichever group or alliance of groups emerged on top in Iraq would build on their success. Before long we could expect an “insurgency” in Kuwait: the assassination of a few key figures, some beheadings and suicide bombings. The wave would continue into Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Pakistan and beyond. Who would stop it? How would they stop it? With expanding territory, population and resources, including vast oil wealth, the leaders of the new totalitarian confederation or empire – or caliphate -- could manipulate the world's economy to its benefit and to the detriment of those few nations who might dare obstruct their ascendance. Nuclear, biological and chemical weapons would soon be theirs. They'd want them only for peaceful purposes, of course; and for deterrence.

Before long, the dream of both Saddam and bin Laden would be realized. There would be an oil-rich, nuclear-armed new superpower, a true rival to the decadent and divided West. Quietly, it would empower “non-state actors,” AKA, terrorist groups.

In Europe, radical Islamists would become increasingly demanding. They'd find European leaders surprisingly accommodating. Americans, by contrast, would be obstreperous and try to better seal their borders. Such efforts would only delay the inevitable. Chances are that, eventually, a nuclear weapon or germ bomb would be detonated in some American population center. World leaders would express sympathy. But what could be done? Investigate who had supplied it to whom? Ask the United Nations to impose sanctions? Retaliate against the civilian populations of Baghdad and Tehran?
With so much on the line -- in May's vision, a potential Middle East apocalypse -- you'd think that maybe the Bush Administration would have thought things through a little more carefully. Maybe not have scoffed at Shinseki's numbers. Maybe have listened to the civilian DODs less and to the military DODs more. Maybe have conceded that sometimes the worst case scenarios do come true.

But no.

So now we get this bizarre buck-up jeremiad (in my head, I hear Stallone/Rambo):
This enemy is different. This war is different. This time, America has to win. Failure is not an option.
Oh, and by the way, 9/11 changed everything.

No comments: